Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Perez-Lopez v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00021
Defendant:
A.C.C.C. Washington MS., GEO Group Inc. and Great Plains CI
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perez-Lopez
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Lopez v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00017
Defendant:
A.C.C.C. Washington MS., Geo Group Inc. and Great Plains CI
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perez-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harden v. The GEO Group, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00317
Plaintiff:
Aron Harden
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Collins v. Geo Group Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
Ernest E. Collins
Defendant:
Geo Group Inc., James Tunstan, Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newsome v. Boswell Pharmacy et al
as 4:2011cv00131
Plaintiff:
Anthony Melvin Newsome
Defendant:
Boswell Pharmacy, Norma Evans, Gloria Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00081
Plaintiff:
William L. Johnson
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Jessie Streeter, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leavitt v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00199
Plaintiff:
Scott Leavitt
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Epps et al
as 4:2010cv00197
Plaintiff:
Tommy Jackson
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, GEO Group Inc., Dale Caskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Streeter et al
as 3:2010cv00108
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Jessie Streeter, Sandra Radgus, Anthony Lesur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bunton v. Global Enterprise Organization GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00080
Plaintiff:
Tony Terrell Bunton
Defendant:
Global Enterprise Organization GEO Group, Inc., Lepher Jenkins, Willie M. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
