Cases 1 - 10 of 231
Olageshin v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00360
Defendant:
Miracle McMillian and Tonia Lane
Plaintiff:
Temitope Olageshin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Lane Co et al
as 4:2024cv03201
Defendant:
Mrs Wood, Heather Glover, J Lane Co and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odem, Jr. v. Muniz et al
as 9:2024cv00167
Defendant:
Jarry D. Adams, Troy W. Driskell, State Classification Subsequent Hearing Committee Member #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Benny R. Odem, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Lane et al
as 9:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Donald Foster
Defendant:
Darron Lane, Donald Muniz, Dwight L. Blackshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pina v. Martinez et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
John Pina
Defendant:
FNU Martinez, FNU Lane and FNU Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pina v. Martinez et al
as 6:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
John Pina
Defendant:
FNU Martinez, FNU Lane and FNU Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Lane Murray Dept. of Justice
as 7:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Le'Tura Sanders
Defendant:
Lane Murray Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Discovery Card Corporate Office et al
as 4:2023cv01132
Plaintiff:
Lane Henderson
Defendant:
Discovery Card Corporate Office, Roger C. Hochschild, John T. Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Lane et al
as 6:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
David B Byrd
Respondent:
Darron A Lane, Jr, Homes L Sandles and Fernand F Fafso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Byrd v. Lane et al
as 9:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
David B Byrd
Defendant:
Darron A Lane, Jr, Homes L Sandles and Fernand F Fafso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
