Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Moffett v. Marshall
as 4:2021cv02490
Plaintiff:
Christopher Moffett
Defendant:
Lucinda Kay Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres et al v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2018cv04827
Plaintiff:
Ramon Torres, Melvin Joseph, Joseph Reyes and others
Defendant:
Sgt. Flournoy, Sgt. Villaloboz, Sgt. Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mamudu v. Moffett et al
as 1:2018cv00562
Defendant:
FNU Redo, FNU FuQua, T Moffett and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel G Mamudu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. University of Texas Medical Branch (Galveston) et al
as 1:2017cv00167
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Roderick Thomas
Respondent:
Maricia R Jackson, Christopher Norsworthy, Victor D Boston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. University of Texas Medical Branch (Galveston) et al .
as 4:2017cv01211
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Roderick Thomas
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical Branch (Galveston), Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Lorie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Anthony et al
as 3:2014cv00309
Plaintiff:
Broderick Deroyce Brown
Defendant:
Barry Anthony, Michael C Presas, Anthony D Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Moffett et al
as 3:2012cv00220
Plaintiff:
michael turner
Defendant:
Timothy Moffett , Brad Livingston and TDCJ
Amicu:
General Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moffett v. Collier et al
as 1:2010cv00676
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Christina Melton Crain, Stuart Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Malcom C. Moffett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Lemons et al
as 4:2010cv00452
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Shelton
Defendant:
Michael Lemons, Brenda J Hough, John Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raney v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 3:2007cv00425
Plaintiff:
Frank Wilford Raney, II
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Cheryl Moffett and Buzman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
