Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Pitts v. Forrest County, et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Defendant:
Shane Lamar Boyle, Forrest County, Officer Jason Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewitt Pitts
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carson v. City of Vicksburg et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Phillip Carson
Defendant:
City of Vicksburg, Robert Doe WC 74, Lt. Jeff Merritt and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredenburg v. LaBarre
as 1:2020cv00231
Defendant:
William LaBarre
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Phillip Fredenburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tedder v. Banks et al
as 4:2019cv00128
Defendant:
Warden Wendell Banks, Officer Gary, Captain Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
William Phillip Tedder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Phillips v. Williams et al
as 4:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
Marshall Phillips
Defendant:
Kevin Williams and Ora Starks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Teddy Griffin
Defendant:
Ms. Tellies, Danny Harris, Dorothy Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witherspoon v. Morris et al
as 4:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
Desmond Witherspoon
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Andru Mills, Tony Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGilberry v. Scott et al
as 4:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
Phillip McGilberry
Defendant:
Ricky Scott and C.I.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGilberry v. Morris et al
as 4:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
Phillip McGilberry
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Johnnie Denmark and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Kirklin et al
as 4:2015cv00054
Plaintiff:
Phillip Earl Young
Defendant:
Robert Kirklin, Hallie Gail Bridges, Martha Grant Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
