Cases 41 - 50 of 841,216
Davis v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv06721
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Davis
Defendant:
Exactech, US, Inc. and Exactech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06715
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Edinger et al. v. Menards, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01630
Plaintiff:
Rachael Edinger and Eric S. Edinger
Defendant:
Menards, Inc. doing business as Menards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01631
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
YATVIN v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv05092
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
HARPER YATVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
GALLARDO v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv05079
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
MITZILA GALLARDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fallin v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv05084
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
Nancy Fallin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ROGERS v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv05094
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROGERS
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
