Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Lucas v. BMS Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv02159
Plaintiff:
Tim Lucas and Tim Lucas
Defendant:
BMS Enterprises, Inc., BMS Management Co., Inc., Blackmon Mooring of Austin, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
POTTER v. BWXT Pantex LLC
as 2:2009cv00195
Plaintiff:
TIM POTTER
Defendant:
BWXT Pantex LLC
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
POTTER v. BWXT Pantex LLC
as 2:2009xc00192
Plaintiff:
TIM POTTER
Defendant:
BWXT Pantex LLC
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
White v. Big Lots Stores Inc
as 2:2009cv05127
Plaintiff:
Tim D. White, Tim D. White and Tim D. White
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Buddemeier v. VLZ Detailing et al
as 6:2009cv00007
Defendant:
VLZ Detailing, Vincent Veliz, Felipe Veliz and others
Plaintiff:
William Buddemeier, Tim Johnston and Shawn Kline
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gibson v. Michels Management Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00014
Plaintiff:
VanNessa Gibson
Defendant:
Michels Management Corporation and Tim Michels
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Maynard v. JLG Industries, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv03684
Plaintiff:
Tim Maynard
Defendant:
JLG Industries, Inc. and JLG Equipment Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Simmons et al v. DirecTech Southwest, Inc
as 2:2008cv04642
Plaintiff:
Robert Simmons, Robert Simmons, Robert Simmons and others
Defendant:
DirecTech Southwest, Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chappell et al v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.
as 2:2008cv04329
Plaintiff:
William R. Chappell, Paula Sue Cox, Debbie P. Dean and others
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Royal Fixtures, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv02198
Plaintiff:
Tim B Thomas
Defendant:
Royal Fixtures, Inc., New Era Products, Inc. and Albert Chen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
