Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Weeks v. Lamar University - Beaumont et al
as 1:2019cv00438
Defendant:
Texas State University System and Lamar University - Beaumont
Plaintiff:
Dr. Kelly Weeks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickey v. 3S Services, LLC
as 2:2013cv00402
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dickey, JB Burns, Jr, Quentin B Burns and others
Defendant:
3S Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Dale v. Tornado Production Services, LLC.
as 2:2015cv00334
Plaintiff:
Lamar Dale
Defendant:
Tornado Production Services, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. Turnco, LLC
as 4:2013cv03315
Plaintiff:
Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Turnco, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kelly v. Fast Recycling Inc
as 3:2013cv00961
Plaintiff:
Lamar Kelly
Defendant:
Fast Recycling Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Diaz Gomez v. Kim Phung Lamar, LLC. et al
as 1:2010cv00963
Plaintiff:
Rodil Diaz Gomez
Defendant:
Kim Phung Lamar, LLC. and Phuong T. Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Miller v. Lamar Technical Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv03522
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Miller
Defendant:
Lamar Technical Services, Inc. and Larry J. Krenek
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Pedigo v. 3003 South Lamar, LLP
as 1:2008cv00803
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Pedigo and Jacquelyn Pedigo
Movant:
Steven Wimberly
Defendant:
3003 South Lamar, LLP
Counter Plaintiff:
3003 South Lamar, LLP
Counter Defendant:
Jacquelyn Pedigo and Jacquelyn Pedigo
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Qureshi v. Panjwani et al
as 4:2008cv03154
Plaintiff:
Arif M. Qureshi
Defendant:
Karim Panjwani, Feroz Panjwani, Shamsuddin Panjwani and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
