Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Johnson v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 4:2017cv00630
Plaintiff:
Rodney Johnson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruiz v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 3:2015cv00106
Plaintiff:
Hector Ruiz
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Musachia v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2013cv01163
Plaintiff:
Joseph Musachia
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Gomez v. Public Law Board 6719 et al
as 3:2009cv00630
Plaintiff:
James A. Gomez
Defendant:
Public Law Board 6719 and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
BNSF Railway Company et al v. United Transportation Union and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen
as 4:2009cv00376
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company and others
Defendant:
United Transportation Union and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Rice v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2008cv00118
Plaintiff:
Stephen C Rice
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dirden v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2008cv00116
Plaintiff:
George R Dirden
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Horstman v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 9:2007cv00109
Plaintiff:
Todd Horstman and Todd Horstman
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2007cv01185
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen,
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
