Cases 91 - 100 of 1,074
Avalos v. Freemyer Industrial Pressure, LP
as 4:2023cv00583
Plaintiff:
Juan Avalos
Defendant:
Freemyer Industrial Pressure, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Phu v. American First National Bank
as 4:2023cv02080
Plaintiff:
Phuong Kim Phu
Defendant:
American First National Bank
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Busby v. ASAP Inc.
as 3:2023cv00347
Defendant:
ASAP Inc. and Waitr Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joanna Busby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. IMM Payroll, LLC
as 3:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Dimonah Brown
Defendant:
IMM Payroll, LLC d/b/a Residence Inn Marriott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
FILING ERROR
as 1:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Robert S Dill
Defendant:
AEGIS Defense Services LLC d/b/a Gardaworld Federal Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
Dill v. AEGIS Defense Services LLC
as 3:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Robert S Dill
Defendant:
AEGIS Defense Services LLC doing business as Gardaworld Federal Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
Turnage v. Jackson/Hinds Library System
as 3:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Judith Turnage
Defendant:
Jackson/Hinds Library System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rodriguez v. D.R. Horton, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
Anna Nicole Rodriguez
Defendant:
D.R. Horton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Leach v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
as 3:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Devan Leach
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stroud v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Michaela Stroud
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
