Cases 1 - 10 of 805
Lampl v. oXya Corporation
as 4:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Brad Lampl
Defendant:
oXya Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Medrano v. Paragon Professional Services, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Medrano
Defendant:
Paragon Professional Services, LLC and Asset Protection and Security Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
SHIN v. GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION A/K/A VIAPATH TECHNOLOGIES
as 5:2024cv00473
Defendant:
Global Tel*link Corporation and ViaPath Technologies (ViaPath)
Plaintiff:
DON SHIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Flores v. County of Hidalgo
as 7:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Maria Teresa Flores
Defendant:
County of Hidalgo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Brewer v. Black Mountain Sand, LLC
as 5:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Matthew Brewer
Defendant:
Black Mountain Sand, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Jacobs v. Selma Management, LLC.
as 5:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Julieta Jacobs
Defendant:
Selma Management, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Robinson v. Coalition, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01125
Plaintiff:
Seth Robinson
Defendant:
Coalition, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Elliott v. Walmart, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Dimetria Elliott
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Walmart Inc
Other:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FILING ERROR
as 5:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Artie P Mozzone
Defendant:
Fresh From Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mozzone v. Fresh From Texas, LLC
as 5:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Artie P Mozzone
Defendant:
Fresh From Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
