Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Romero v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00083
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Rosa E. Romero
Notice Only Party: Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Romero v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00504
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Teodoro Romero
Notice Only Party: Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Romero v. Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2014cv03001
Defendant: U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Don Anthony Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Romero v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00292
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Felipe Guadalupe Romero
Notice Only Party: Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Romero v. Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2013cv00243
Plaintiff: Keena Hayes Romero
Defendant: U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Romero v. Astrue
as 6:2010cv00208
Defendant: Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff: Rito Romero, Jr.
Notice Only Party: Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Romero v. Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2009cv00155
Plaintiff: Ray Romero
Defendant: U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?