Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 93
Taylor, et al v. Acxiom Corp, et al
as 08-41232
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHARON TAYLOR, JAMES DOUGLAS BOOKER, LOWRY BRILEY and others
Defendant - Appellee: ACXIOM CORP, CHOICEPOINT PUBLIC RECORDS DATABASE TECH INC, CHOICEPOINT PUBLIC RECORDS INC and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF TEXAS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CONSUMER DATA INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
Taylor, et al v. Acxiom Corp, et al
as 08-41180
Petitioner - Appellant: SHARON TAYLOR
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES DOUGLAS BOOKER, LOWRY BRILEY, TWILAH BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee: ACXIOM CORP, CHOICEPOINT PUBLIC RECORDS DATABASE TECH INC, CHOICEPOINT PUBLIC RECORDS INC and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF TEXAS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CONSUMER DATA INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
Taylor, et al v. Acxiom Corp, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-41083
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHARON TAYLOR, JAMES DOUGLAS BOOKER, LOWRY BRILEY and others
Defendant - Appellee: ACXIOM CORP, CHOICEPOINT PUBLIC RECORDS DATABASE TECH INC, CHOICEPOINT PUBLIC RECORDS INC and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF TEXAS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CONSUMER DATA INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
Allen et al v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2008cv04302
Plaintiff: Alton Allen, Alton Allen, Adrian Anthony Andrews and others
Defendant: United States of America and United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0742 Suits in Admiralty Act
Type: Other Statutes None
Scooters Unlimited and DME Inc et al v. Leavitt et al
as 3:2008cv00980
Plaintiff: Scooters Unlimited and DME Inc, Scooters Unlimited and DME Inc, Reliable Medical Supply Inc and others
Defendant: Michael O Leavitt and Kerry N Weems
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. v. Utex Communications Corp
as 1:2007cv00445
Plaintiff: Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P., Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P., Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. and others
Defendant: Utex Communications Corp, Utex Communications Corp and Utex Communications Corp
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521 Cable Communications
Southwestern Bell v. City of Houston We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-20320
Plaintiff - Appellant: SOUTHWESTERN BELL, doing business as AT&T
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF HOUSTON
Amicus Curiae: TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, TEXAS CITY ATTORNEYS' ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS OFFICERS AND ADVISORS and others
Southwestern Bell Telephone L.P. et al v. Time Warner Cable San Antonio Division, L.P.
as 5:2007cv00173
Plaintiff: Southwestern Bell Telephone L.P., Southwestern Bell Telephone L.P., SBC Long Distance, LLC and others
Defendant: Time Warner Cable San Antonio Division, L.P.
Counter Plaintiff: Time Warner Cable San Antonio Division, L.P., Time Warner Cable San Antonio Division, L.P. and Time Warner Cable San Antonio Division, L.P.
Counter Defendant: SBC Internet Services, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone L.P. and SBC Long Distance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Fitch v. Public Util Cmsn TX, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-50088
Plaintiff - Appellant: F CARY FITCH, doing business as Affordable Telecom
Defendant - Appellee: PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS, SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO, doing business as AT&T Texas, PAUL HUDSON, In His Individual and Official Capacity and others
Tex-Link Communications, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas et al
as 1:2007cv00040
Plaintiff: Tex-Link Communications, Inc. and Tex-Link Communications, Inc.
Defendant: Public Utility Commission of Texas, Public Utility Commission of Texas, Paul Hudson and others
Counter Plaintiff: Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.
Counter Defendant: Tex-Link Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Federal Communications Commission

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?