Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Chatman v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 2:2010cv01820
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Chatman
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and Jefferson Parish School Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amato et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2010cv00932
Plaintiff:
Sandra Quilio, Gail Bourgeois, Kathyrn Reid and others
Defendant:
Old Dominion Insurance Company, Albanese-Popkin The Oaks Development Group, L.P., Banner Supply International, LLC and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Susan Beckendorf, Edward Beckendorf, Byron Byrne and others
Cross Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Keasley et al v. MTT Enterprises, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00436
Plaintiff:
Keisha Keasley, Kiara Keasley, Brittany Chatman and others
Defendant:
MTT Enterprises, LLC, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, Ochsner Baptist Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chatman et al v. Chase Home Finance, LLC.
as 2:2009cv00200
Plaintiff:
Charles Chatman and Carol Chatman
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lindsey et al v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit et al
as 3:2008cv01096
Plaintiff:
James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant:
Dallas Area Rapid Transit and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Lindsey et al v. ATU International et al
as 3:2008cv00232
Plaintiff:
James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant:
ATU International, ATU International, Amalgamated Transit Union Local Division 1635 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
