Cases 11 - 20 of 101
Casillas v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00200
Plaintiff:
Roland Casillas
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Polk v. Citimortgage, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00077
Plaintiff:
Manfred Polk
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc. , Citigroup, Inc. , Equifax Credit Bureau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Abrams v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00215
Plaintiff:
Rodney Abrams
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. and First Federal Bank, FSB, n/k/a First Federal Bank of Kansas City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bissell, et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association, et al.
as 4:2016cv03414
Defendant:
William Bissell , Kimberly Bissell , Federal National Mortgage Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dabney, Jr. v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00987
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eugene E Dabney, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Vinson Kasmani v. CitiMortgage, Inc
as 4:2016cv00969
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc
Plaintiff:
Nichole Brianne Vinson Kasmani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phipps v. CitiMortgage, Inc
as 4:2016cv00954
Plaintiff:
Patricia A Phipps
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herbert et al v. Citimortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Nicholas E. Herbert and Mary D. McCaleb Herbert
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc., Citibank, N.A. and John and Jane Does A-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 2:2015cv02110
Plaintiff:
Jacob Smith and Natalie Smith
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sides et al v. CitiMortgage Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Jason Sides and Donna Sides
Defendant:
CitiMortgage Inc. and Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.