Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Lauri Valjakka v. Google LLC
as 6:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Lauri Valjakka
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lauri Valjakka v. Apple Inc.
as 6:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Lauri Valjakka
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Valjakka v. Microsoft Corporation
as 6:2021cv01006
Plaintiff:
Lauri Valjakka
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Valjakka v. Netflix, Inc.
as 6:2021cv00947
Plaintiff:
Lauri Valjakka
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Valjakka v. Akamai Technologies, Inc.
as 6:2021cv00942
Plaintiff:
Lauri Valjakka
Defendant:
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Valjakka v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 6:2021cv00944
Plaintiff:
Lauri Valjakka
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Valjakka v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 6:2021cv00945
Plaintiff:
Lauri Valjakka
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., Amazon Web Services, Inc. and Amazon.com Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Oberg et al v. Twinedge, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00707
Plaintiff:
John Oberg, Steve Walsh, Todd Christenson and others
Defendant:
Twinedge, Inc., Christina Schweiger and Richard Bagdonas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Capital Lodging LLC v. Brown et al
as 2:2012cv00467
Plaintiff:
Capital Lodging LLC
Defendant:
Richard Brown, Laurie McCarthy, Morgan Chase Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
McFadin, et al v. Gerber, et al
as 09-50083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAURIE D MCFADIN, doing business as Two Bar West and STACY L MCFADIN, doing business as Two Bar West
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNN GERBER, doing business as Foxy Roxy's, doing business as Eternal Perspective Handbags, WILLIAM GERBER, II, doing business as Foxy Roxy's, doing business as Eternal Perspective Handbags and CONNIE GRENEMYER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
