Cases 1 - 10 of 19
WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. FedEx Corporation
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
WirelessWerx IP, LLC
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Transcend Shipping Systems, LLC v. FedEx Corporation
as 2:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Transcend Shipping Systems, LLC
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
R2 Solutions LLC v. Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.,
as 4:2021cv00940
Plaintiff:
R2 Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Flectere LLC v. FedEx Corporation
as 2:2019cv00018
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation
Plaintiff:
Flectere LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00980
Plaintiff:
Intellectual Ventures II LLC
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation, Federal Express Corporation, GENCO Distribution System, Inc. and others
In Re:
Wm Stephen Boyd
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom and Scott Woloson
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Graham Springs LLC v. Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00912
Defendant:
Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Graham Springs LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Loramax LLC v. FedEx Corporation
as 2:2015cv00751
Plaintiff:
Loramax LLC
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Avioniqs LLC v. Fedex Corporation
as 3:2015cv00397
Plaintiff:
Avioniqs LLC
Defendant:
Fedex Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CDR Printing LLC v. Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00801
Plaintiff:
CDR Printing LLC
Defendant:
Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Catharon Intellectual Property, LLC v. FedEx Corporate Services, Incorporated
as 2:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Catharon Intellectual Property, LLC
Defendant:
FedEx Corporate Services, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
