Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Elite Gaming Tech LLC v. LSI Corporation
as 2:2021cv00334
Plaintiff:
Elite Gaming Tech LLC
Defendant:
LSI Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Longhorn HD LLC. v. LSI Corporation
as 2:2021cv00114
Plaintiff:
Longhorn HD LLC.
Defendant:
LSI Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Carnegie Mellon University v. LSI Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00664
Plaintiff:
Carnegie Mellon University
Respondent:
Dr. Aleksandar Kavcic
Defendant:
Aleksandar Kavcic
Counter Plaintiff:
Avago Technologies U.S. Inc. and LSI Corporation
Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. Broadcom Limited et al
as 2:2016cv00134
Plaintiff:
Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
Defendant:
Broadcom Limited , Broadcom Corporation , Avago Technologies, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Vantage Point Technology, Inc. v. LSI Corporation
as 2:2013cv00990
Plaintiff:
Vantage Point Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
LSI Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lake Cherokee Hard Drive Technologies, L.L.C. v. Bass Computers, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00216
Plaintiff:
Lake Cherokee Hard Drive Technologies, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Bass Computers, Inc., Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Inc., LSI Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Freescale Semiconductor v. LSI
as 2:2008cv00314
Plaintiff:
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
Defendant:
LSI Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LSI Corporation et al v. United Microelectronics Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv00165
Plaintiff:
LSI Corporation and Agere Systems Inc.
Defendant:
United Microelectronics Corporation, Integrated Device Technology Inc, AMIC Technology Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harthcock v. MIPS Technologies Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00515
Plaintiff:
Jerry David Harthcock
Defendant:
MIPS Technologies Inc, Adimos Inc, Advanced Micro Devices Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
