Cases 11 - 20 of 468
Davis v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00065
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Angela Sue Davis
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Matthews v. Astrue
as 4:2013cv00194
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Matthews
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Collins v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00050
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Loruhamah Eve Collins
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Paternostro v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00049
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Paternostro
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Cherry v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00030
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Deborah L. Cherry
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Henderson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2012cv00809
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Joseph Earl Henderson
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Haynes v. Astrue
as 6:2012cv00330
Defendant:
Michael Astrue and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Plaintiff:
James Marcus Haynes, Jr
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
FILING ERROR
as 6:2012cv00331
Defendant:
Michael Astrue and James Marcus Haynes, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Odom v. Astrue
as 6:2012cv00914
Plaintiff:
Roland Odom
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Scott v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00736
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Anthony Scott
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
