Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Stewart v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 7:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Tina Stewart
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
James David Stewart
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Stewart v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv00148
Plaintiff:
Dilan Lane Stewart
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Stewart v. Commissioner of SSA
as 1:2021cv00204
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Commissioner of SSA
Plaintiff:
Catherine Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2021cv00065
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Mary Jane Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00232
Plaintiff:
James David Stewart
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jones v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00252
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ann Stewart Jones
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Stewart v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00534
Plaintiff:
Brent Perry Stewart
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Stewart v. Colvin
as 4:2017cv02148
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Stewart
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Stewart v. Colvin
as 6:2016cv00097
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Plaintiff:
Angelo Dexter Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
