Cases 91 - 100 of 224
Jessica Paz-Moran v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen
as 20-61028
Petitioner:
Jessica Iveth Paz-Moran
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
Jessica Ward v. USA
as 20-10836
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jessica Ward, also known as Jessica Lynn Ward
Estate of Jessica Brown v. City of Lucedale, Mississippi
as 20-60693
Defendant / Appellee:
George County, Mississippi
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Estate of Jessica Danielle Brown
James v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 3:2020cv01624
Plaintiff:
Jessica James
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mark Ricks v. Jessica Khan, et al
as 20-20303
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMIE WILLIAMS, MONICA PICKTHALL, JOHN DOE, UTMB Doctor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK EUGENE RICKS
Barbara Cobb, et al v. James Construction Group
as 20-40342
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUIS SALINAS, JESSICA RYANE COBB, Individually, BARBARA COBB, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of William Cobb, Deceased and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES CONSTRUCTION GROUP, L.L.C.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00323
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jessica Gonzalez-Gutierrez v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60413
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
JESSICA ROXANA GONZALEZ-GUTIERREZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
