Cases 11 - 20 of 32
USA v. James Griffith
as 19-50260
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES ALBERT GRIFFITH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Banks v. Rees et al
as 3:2018cv00816
Plaintiff:
India Banks , Alicia Patterson , JoAnn Griffiths and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Rees , Think Finance Inc , Think Finance SPV LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaisance et al v. Schiller et al
as 4:2017cv03741
Plaintiff:
Kristen Plaisance , Robbie Plaisance , Richie Corley and others
Defendant:
John D. Schiller, Jr. , D. West Griffin , Hill A. Feinberg and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Windrock, Inc., v. Advancing Machinery Solutions LLC
as 4:2017cv03705
Plaintiff:
Windrock, Inc.,
Defendant:
Advancing Machinery Solutions LLC , William A. Griffith , Glenn Mincher and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Griffith, Jr. v. BP PLC et al
as 2:2016cv04778
Defendant:
BP PLC, BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and others
Plaintiff:
James S. Griffith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Carolyn Barnes v. Ken Paxton, et al
as 16-50142
Defendant / Appellee:
JAKE LNU, BURT CARNES, in his personal capacity, PAUL BOGAN, in his personal capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAROLYN BARNES, individually and on behalf of her children
Timothy Frazin v. Haynes & Boone, L.L.P., et al
as 14-10547
Debtor:
In the Matter of: TIMOTHY MICHAEL FRAZIN
Appellant:
TIMOTHY MICHAEL FRAZIN
Appellee:
HAYNES & BOONE, L.L.P., NINA CORTELL, WARREN DODSON and others
The Shaw Group Inc et al v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al
as 3:2014mc00005
Notice Only:
Scott Griffith
Defendant:
North American Specialty Insurance Company and Zurich American Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Shaw Process Fabrications Inc and The Shaw Group Inc
United States of America v. Griffith
as 4:2014mc00077
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Ray E. Griffith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
