Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Monarch Investments, LLC v. Aurrecoechea et al
as 1:2014cv01019
Defendant:
Candice Aguirre, Alejandro Aurrecoechea, Fernando Aurrecoechea and others
Plaintiff:
Monarch Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
USA v. Sameh Danhach
as 14-20339
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SAMEH KHALED DANHACH, also known as Andrew
Khaled Mahmoud v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-60232
Petitioner:
KHALED MAHMOUD
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Abdel-Abdallha et al v. BP Exploration & Production Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01263
Plaintiff:
Aimam Abdel-Abdallha , Yahya O. Abdelfattah , Khaled Omar Abdelfattah and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Khaled Asadi v. G.E. Energy (USA), L.L.C.
as 12-20522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KHALED ASADI
Defendant - Appellee:
G.E. ENERGY (USA), L.L.C.
In re: Tara Seaton, et al
as 12-30187
Petitioner:
In re: KHALED ABDELFATTAH, YAHJA ABDELFATTAH, also known as Jay, AHMED ABDELNADI and others
Defendant - Respondent:
TRITON ASSET LEASING GMBH, TRANSOCEAN HOLDINGS, L.L.C., TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING INC and others
Asadi v. G.E. Energy (USA), LLC
as 4:2012cv00345
Plaintiff:
Khaled Asadi
Defendant:
G.E. Energy (USA), LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
USA v. Khaled Nagi
as 09-60325
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KHALED HEZAM NAGI, also known as Adam
Elberzre v. FBI et al
as 4:2009mc00135
Petitioner:
Khaldoun Khaled Elberzre
Defendant:
FBI, Robert S Mueller, III, Janet Napolitano and others
Mohammed Abu Kaff v. Eric Holder, Jr, U S Attorney
as 09-60120
Petitioner:
MOHAMMED KHALED ABU KAFF, Mohammed Abu-Kaff
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
