Cases 11 - 20 of 334
Med Choice Home Health v. Young
as 23-40507
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Medical Choice Home Health, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
Cecile Erwin Young, in her official capacity as the Executive Commissioner of Texas Health & Human Services Commission, a governmental entity of the State of Texas
Medical Choice Home Health, LLC v. Young
as 1:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Medical Choice Home Health, LLC
Defendant:
Cecile Erwin Young and SurveyMonkey, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
FDIC v. Ernst & Young
as 23-90025
Petitioner:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for First NBC Bank
Respondent:
Ernst & Young, L.L.P. and Gloucester Insurance Limited
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Young
as 23-30379
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jacque Pierre Young
USA v. Lewis
as 23-10506
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Felton Eugene Lewis, also known as Gene Lewis, also known as Oldon Young, also known as Oguy Donor Nyou, also known as John Thick
Young v. SECIn re: Young v. SEC
as 23-20179
Petitioner:
In re: Marian P. Young and Saving2Retire, L.L.C.
Respondent:
Securities and Exchange Commission
USA v. Mun
as 23-10004
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Su Y. Amos Mun, also known as Amos Su Young Mun
USA v. Young
as 22-11098
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
James Edward Young
Young v. Southern Housing Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00084
Defendant:
Southern Housing Enterprises, Inc., Southern Housing of Nettleton, Inc., Champion Home Builders, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Patsy Young
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
