Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Exxon Mobil Corporation et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2020cv00120
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., BNSF Railway Company and others
Plaintiff: Exxon Mobil Corporation, Imperial Oil Limited, Imperial Oil and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
James Million, et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-30002
Plaintiff / Appellant: GLORIA MILLION and JAMES MILLION
Defendant / Appellee: EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Exxon Chemical Company/ Exxon Refining & Supply Company, BROCK SERVICES, L.L.C. and PROTHERM SERVICES GROUP, L.L.C.
Parish of Cameron v. BP America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-30829
Intervenor / Appellee: STATE OF LOUISIANA, EX REL, JEFF LANDRY and STATE OF LOUISIANA, on behalf of Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, on behalf of Office of Coastal Management, on behalf of Thomas F. Harris
Defendant / Appellant: CHEVRON USA HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, SHELL OFFSHORE, INCORPORATED, BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: PARISH OF CAMERON
Amicus Curiae: Texas Civil Justice League, Incorporated, Louisiana Association of Business and Industry, American Petroleum Institute and others
Stourbridge Investments LLC v. Avery et al
as 3:2019cv02267
Defendant: William W. George, Kenneth C. Frazier, William C. Weldon and others
Plaintiff: Stourbridge Investments LLC
Not Yet Classified: Samuel Montini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BAE Systems Resolution Inc., et al v. Mission Transport, LLC, et al
as 5:2019cv00974
Defendant: Lee Roy Meadows, Baumann Auto Repair, Inc., Nielsen's Garage and others
Plaintiff: Flint CPS Inks Holdings LLC, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Structural Metals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
James Million, et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al
as 19-30643
Plaintiff / Appellant: GLORIA MILLION and JAMES MILLION
Defendant / Appellee: BROCK SERVICES, L.L.C., PROTHERM SERVICES GROUP, L.L.C. and EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Exxon Chemical Company/ Exxon Refining & Supply Company
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al
as 19-50597
Defendant / Appellee: EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Plaquemines Parish v. Riverwood Production Co., Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-30492
Defendant / Appellant: CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, As Successor in Interest to General American Oil Company of Texas, EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, As Successor in Interest to Exxon Corporation and Humble Oil and Refining Company and CHEVRON USA, INCORPORATED, As Successor in Interest to Chevron Oil Company and The California Company
Intervenor / Appellee: LOUISIANA STATE EX REL. JEFF LANDRY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF LOUISIANA, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris and JEFFREY MARTIN LANDRY, Esq.
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLAQUEMINES PARISH, LOUISIANA STATE, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris and PARISH OF PLAQUEMINES
Atakapa Indian de Creole Nation v. Trump et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00028
Plaintiff: Edward Moses Jr Atakapa Indian de Creole Nation, Mr Freddie DeCourt and Atakapa Indian de Creole Nation
Defendant: Murphy J. Paul, Jr., Governor John Bel Edwards, Mayor LaToya Cantrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaquemines et al v. ConocoPhillips Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv05230
Intervenor_plaintiff: Louisiana Department of Natural Resources and Louisiana State
Defendant: ConocoPhillips Company , Chevron U.S.A., Inc. , Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Plaquemines Parish and Louisiana State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?