Cases 21 - 30 of 407
D.A. et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 3:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
DA, A.A. and Lucinda del Carmen Padilla Gonzales
Defendant:
United States of America, The, Heartland Alliance for Human Needs and Human Rights and Heartland Human Care Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
USA v. Gonzales
as 22-10948
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Damien Dre Gonzales
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Sabino's Italian Restaurant LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00538
Defendant:
Sabino B. Gonzalez, Sabino's Italian Restaurant LLC doing business as Roma's Italian Restaurant doing business as Roma's Italian Restaurant Bar & Grill and Sabino Gonzales
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv02317
Plaintiff:
Mr. SAMUEL DELEON and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Mr. Valentin Gonzales and PEREZ INTERESTS, LLC d/b/a PERCO INDUSTRIAL
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv02316
Plaintiff:
Mr. Samuel DeLeon, Mr. Valentin Gonzales and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
PEREZ INTERESTS, LLC d/b/a PERCO INDUSTRIAL
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
USA v. Gonzales
as 22-50599
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Eden Christian Gonzales
USA v. Gonzales
as 22-10651
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Angel Nicole Gonzales
USA v. Gonzales
as 22-10537
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John David Gonzales
USA v. Gonzales
as 22-10292
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Armando Gonzales, also known as Armando Gonzalez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
