Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Kohute et al v. Ganeriwala et al
as 6:2018cv00235
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Kohute and Pamela Joyce Nichols
Defendant:
Manju Ganeriwala, Kelly Thomasson and Karen Francis Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palma v. Luker et al
as 4:2018mc00391
Plaintiff:
Michael Palma
Defendant:
Lawrence W Luker, Rosalie Candelar, Larry Pyles and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Booth Family Trust v. Baker Hughes Incorporated et al
as 4:2017cv01457
Plaintiff:
Booth Family Trust
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Incorporated , Martin S. Craighead , Gregory D. Brenneman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Claudia Ocoro, et.al. vs. Armando Montelongo, Jr., et.al.
as 5:2016cv01278
Plaintiff:
Claudia Ocoro, Kassa Eden, Jemila Weldenhawayat and others
Defendant:
Armando Montelongo, Jr, Armando Montelongo, Jr., Real Estate Training International, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
NEVILLE v. YANG et al
as 5:2016cv01231
Respondent:
ASH CARTER, General FRANK J. GRASS, Deborah L. James and others
Petitioner:
TINA NEVILLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nichols v. USAA Savings Bank
as 5:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nichols and Michael Nichols
Defendant:
USAA Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02926
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rovner v. Baker Hughes Incorporated et al
as 4:2014cv03416
Plaintiff:
Marc Rovner
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Incorporated, Clarence P. Cazalot, Jr., Martin S. Craighead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
