Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Vanessa F. Edwards v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection, et al
as 7:2020cv00150
Plaintiff: Vanessa F Edwards
Defendant: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Deparment of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Doe v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv02389
Defendant: Deputy Chief Ronald D. Vitiello, Exec. Assoc. Dir. Matthew T Albence, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ACLU Foundation of Texas, Inc. v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al
as 4:2017cv01128
Plaintiff: ACLU Foundation of Texas, Inc.
Defendant: U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
In re: USA, et al
as 16-40795
Petitioner: In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Respondent: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al
as 16-40796
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor - Appellant: JANE DOE #1, JANE DOE #2 and JANE DOE #3
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-40238
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Sentrillion Corporation v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
as 3:2014cv00186
Notice Only Party: Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff: Sentrillion Corporation
Defendant: U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Chavez Rodriguez v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00174
Petitioner: Ramon Chavez Rodriguez
In Re: State Court Expunction Order Directed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stanford International Bank Ltd et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00298
Defendant: Claudia Martinez, Pablo M. Alvarado, Gary D. Magness and others
Petitioner: Katherine A Hill, Mariana DeLeon, Robert L. Ward and others
Not Classified By Court: Juan Manuel Dupuy Rada, Frank Carpin, Stephen Barber and others
Interested Party: Aviva Bakshy, Daniel Gomez Ferreiro, John Little and others
Intervenor: Nancy Brownlee, James T. Hassell, Sr., Samuel G Pal and others
Claimant: David Strauss, Sandra Strauss, Richard Gonzales and others
Respondent: Rebecca Reeves-Stanford and Randi Stanford
Intervenor Plaintiff: United States of America, Walton Houston Galleria Office LP and Daniel Acund
Plaintiff: Promotora Marino CA, Roberto Barbar, Securities and Exchange Commission and others
3Rd Party Defendant: BDO USA, LLP and BDO USA LLP
Receiver: Ralph S Janvey and Ralph S. Janvey
Intervenor Defendant: Farmers & Merchants Bank
Trustee: Lynn Turk
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities
Abou-Hamdan v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
as 1:2007cv00964
Plaintiff: Adam Abou-Hamdan
Defendant: U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?