Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Walsh v. Randolph Brooks Federal Credit Union
as 5:2017cv00010
Defendant:
Randolph Brooks Federal Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Dennis Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Randolph v Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2016mc00026
Plaintiff:
Susan Randolph
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. William Tisdale, Jr., et al
as 16-10279
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM RANDOLPH TISDALE, JR.
MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Atlantic Telephone Membership Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv04422
Plaintiff:
MCI Communications Services Inc and Verizon Select Services Inc
Defendant:
Atlantic Telephone Membership Corporation, Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company LLC , Central Telephone Company and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 206
Kingdom Fresh Produce, Inc. et al v. Delta Produce, LP et al
as 5:2014mc00899
Defendant:
Atled, Ltd., Delta Produce, LP, Staci Properties, Ltd. and others
In Re:
Atled, Ltd., Delta Produce, LP, Staci Properties, Ltd. and others
Notice Only Party:
Clerk, U.S. Bankruptcy Court and US Trustee's Office
Plaintiff:
Five Brothers Jalisco Produce Co., Inc., G.R. Produce, Inc., I. Kunik Company, Inc. and others
Trustee:
Randolph N. Osherow
Official Com of Unsecured v. Chase Capital Corporation, et al
as 14-50046
Debtor:
In the Matter of: AGE REFINING, INCORPORATED
Appellant:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS
Appellee:
CHASE CAPITAL CORPORATION, ERIC MOELLER, Chapter 11 Trustee and LIQUIDATING TRUSTEE RANDOLPH N. OSHEROW
Rios et al v. Randolph-Brooks Federal Credit Union
as 5:2013cv00946
Plaintiff:
Juan Javier Rios Covarrubias and Jonathan Rios
Defendant:
Randolph-Brooks Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
