Cases 41 - 50 of 74
USA v. Steven Mallory
as 13-40064
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVEN CLYDE MALLORY
USA v. Lawrence Bringier, Jr.
as 12-30889
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LAWRENCE CLYDE BRINGIER, JR., also known as Junior, also known as Bread
Laird et al v. BP p.l.c. et al
as 2:2012cv00792
Plaintiff:
Clyde Warren Laird , Bruce W. Alexander , Raffael R. Anderson and others
Defendant:
BP p.l.c., BP Exploration and Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Laird et al v. BP p.l.c., et al
as 4:2012cv00722
Plaintiff:
Clyde Warren Laird and Each of the Individuals Listed on Exhibit A
Defendant:
BP p.l.c.,, BP Exploration and Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Clyde Pontefract
as 12-30094
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLYDE J. PONTEFRACT
Crawford v. BP America Production Company
as 2:2011cv02395
Plaintiff:
Clyde Crawford , Shirley Crawford , Gary R. Huey and others
Defendant:
BP America Production Company , Parsons Corporation , Danos & Curole Staffing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Louisiana Public Service Cmsn, et al
as 10-31241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ERIC SKRMETTA, In his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES FIELD, In his capacity as Commissioner and others
Randle v. Midland Funding LLC et al
as 4:2010cv00946
Plaintiff:
Clyde E Randle
Defendant:
Midland Funding LLC and McClesky, Harriger, Brazill & Graf LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Head v. Chesapeake Operating, Inc.
as 4:2010mc00020
Defendant:
Chesapeake Operating, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clyde Head
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
