Cases 41 - 50 of 809
Denley et al v. University of Mississippi Medical Center et al
as 3:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Jerry Denley, J.D. and Chasity Denley
Defendant:
University of Mississippi Medical Center, Casey Shane McLearn and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Salaiz v. ELEVANCE HEALTH, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Erik Salaiz
Defendant:
ELEVANCE HEALTH, INC. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gonzalez v. KELLER POSTMAN LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Yazmin Gonzalez
Defendant:
KELLER POSTMAN LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Graham v. John Does 1-25
as 1:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Daniel Graham
Defendant:
John Does #1 thru 25
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hudnall v. Ramirez
as 23-50143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert K. Hudnall and Sharon Elias Hudnall
Defendant / Appellee:
Alejandro C. Ramirez, Individually and agent for Smith and Ramirez Restoration L.L.C., Smith and Ramirez Restoration, L.L.C. and John Does 1-100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tarpley v. Cash Link USA LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Antonia Tarpley
Defendant:
Cash Link USA LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
