Cases 1 - 6 of 6
EL PASO WATER UTILITIES - PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD, for and on behalf of the City of El Paso, Texas, a Texas municipal corporation v. JAMES C. KENNEY, in his official capacity as Cabinet Secretary of the NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
EL PASO WATER UTILITIES - PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD, for and on behalf of the City of El Paso, Texas, a Texas municipal corporation
Defendant:
JAMES C. KENNEY, in his official capacity as Cabinet Secretary of the NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, JOHN RHODERICK, in his official capacity as Water Protection Division Acting Director of the NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM BRANCARD, KEITH CANDELARIA, LARRY DOMINGUEZ, KRISTA McWILLIAMS, PURVI MODY, KATIE ZEMLICK, KIRK PATTEN, KELSEY RADER, DAVID SYPHER, BONNIE FREY, BRUCE THOMSON, TOBY VELASQUEZ and EDWARD VIGIL, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Candelaria Hernandez v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60358
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
CANDELARIA HERNANDEZ
Zulme Rodriguez Sanchez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60691
Petitioner:
ZULME MARYLOU RODRIGUEZ SANCHEZ, also known as Candelaria Lynes Cruz
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Tonche et al
as 5:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Candelaria E. Tonche and Miguel A. Tonche
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Candelaria Hernandez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-60583
Petitioner:
CANDELARIA HERNANDEZ, also known as Candelaria Reyes Ortiz
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Macareno et al v. Karon et al
as 5:2008cv00292
Plaintiff:
Pauline Macareno and Margie Candelaria
Defendant:
Michael Karon, B F D Holdings Inc and Eagle Oil Management Co L L C
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
