Cases 1 - 10 of 14
David Thacker, Jr. v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director
as 20-50816
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
MCI Communications Svc, Inc., et al v. Brandenburg Telephone Company, et al
as 18-10796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INCORPORATED and VERIZON SELECT SERVICES INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
BRANDENBURG TELEPHONE COMPANY, DUO COUNTY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE CORPORATION INCORPORATED, NORTH CENTRAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Duo County Telephone Cooperative Corporation Inc et al v. Level 3 Communications LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00990
Plaintiff:
Duo County Telephone Cooperative Corporation Inc , Gearheart Communications Company Inc , Highland Telephone Cooperative Inc and others
Defendant:
Level 3 Communications LLC , Wiltel Communications LLC and Global Crossing Telecommunications Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-10533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MCI Communications Services Inc et al v. Brandenburg Telephone Company et al
as 3:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
MCI Communications Services Inc and Verizon Select Services Inc
Defendant:
Brandenburg Telephone Company , Ballard Rural Telephone Cooperative Corporation Inc , Duo County Telephone Cooperative Corporation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00665
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
