Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kelton v. Nordstrom
as 24-50002
Plaintiff:
Randall Kelton and Kara Bell
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Incorporated, doing business as Nordstrom Rack, Kelsie Fucci, Nathan Hecht and others
USA v. Keeling
as 23-10990
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ricky Lynn Keeling
Kelton et al v. Bell et al
as 1:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Randall Kelton and Kara Bell
Defendant:
Gregory Abbott, Nathan Hetch, Shron Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Luzenia Keel v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner
as 20-10728
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUZENIA S. KEEL
Lloyd Ward v. Robert Yaquinto, et al
as 18-10469
Appellee:
ROBERT YAQUINTO, Chapter 7 Trustee for Bankruptcy Estate of Lloyd Ward, MICHAEL FRANK, DANA BLOCK and others
Appellant:
LLOYD EUGENE WARD
Nathan Smith v. State of Texas, et al
as 13-20263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DICK SCHWARTZ, Esquire (personal and individual capacity), LAW OFFICE OF SCHWARTZ JUNNELL GREENBERG AND OATOUT, ESQUIRE, RON WALKER, Esquire (personal and individual capacity) and others
Nathan Smith v. State of Texas, et al
as 12-20819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, LAW OFFICE OF SCHWARTZ JUNNELL GREENBERG AND OATOUT ESQ, DICK SCHWARTZ, Esquire (personal and individual capacity) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
