Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Abboud v. Lotta Dough, LLC
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Monica Abboud
Defendant:
Lotta Dough, LLC d/b/a Hoboken Pie
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hartman v. First Bank, et al.
as 4:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Monica Hartman
Defendant:
Southern Hills Property Group
Garnishee:
First Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Abboud v. The Savings Bank Mutual Life Insurance Company of Massachusetts
as 4:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Monica Abboud
Defendant:
The Savings Bank Mutual Life Insurance Company of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Abboud v. Haus of Skin Aesthetics LLC
as 4:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Monica Abboud
Defendant:
Haus of Skin Aesthetics LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Abboud v. Snapcommerce Holdings, Inc.
as 4:2023cv04782
Plaintiff:
Monica Abboud
Defendant:
Snapcommerce Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Super
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Santos v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
Monica Santos
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Renteria-Gonzalez v. Garland
as 23-60345
Petitioner:
Monica Renteria-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Michelena v. Michelena et al
as 7:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Monica Michelena
Defendant:
Ronald Michelena, Rick Michelena and Antonio Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Abboud v. Agentra
as 23-10294
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Monica Abboud, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Agentra, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
