Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Save Our Springs v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 1:2024cv00540
Plaintiff: Save Our Springs Alliance
Defendant: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Rethink35 et al v. Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff: Rethink35, Save Our Springs Alliance, Austin Justice Coalition and others
Defendant: Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT), Marc Williams, United States Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
VanDerStok v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-10718
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellant: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae: Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Incorporated, Gun Owners for Safety, Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund and others
St. Dominic Health ServicesIn re: St. Dominic Health Services
as 23-60288
Petitioner: In re: St. Dominic Health Services, Incorporated and Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System, Incorporated
Respondent: Glenda Boswell, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11086
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing business as 80 Percent Arms
Defendant / Appellant: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae: District of Columbia, Brady, 16 Major Cities and others
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11071
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Defendant / Appellant: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae: District of Columbia, Brady, State of New Jersey and others
VanDerStok et al v. Garland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00691
Plaintiff: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G Andren, Tactical Machining LLC and others
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach and others
Petitioner: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms
Amicus Curiae: Gun Owners for Safety, Jason Perry, Ryan Busse and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cao v. Power of Our Sun, LLC
as 4:2021cv00228
Defendant: Power of Our Sun, LLC
Plaintiff: Ty Cao
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Harris v. Our Lady of the Lake Regl Med
as 20-30771
Defendant / Appellee: N.P. Assistant, M.D. Physicians and Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center
Plaintiff / Appellant: James Lamar Harris
Francois v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-30707
Defendant / Appellee: Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Incorporated
Plaintiff / Appellant: Damian Francois

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?