Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Silverthorne v. Sterling Seismic
as 23-90040
Petitioner:
Silverthorne Seismic, L.L.C.
Respondent:
Sterling Seismic Services, Limited, also known as Sterling Seismic & Reservoir Services
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gutierrez Hoyos v. Garland
as 23-60565
Petitioner:
Juan David Gutierrez Hoyos, Maira Alexandra Sterling Sanchez and Nahiara Gutierrez Sterling
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Sterling
as 23-30069
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Elliott Sterling
Pang v. Levitt, et al.
as 1:2022cv01191
Plaintiff:
Mei Pang
Defendant:
Core Scientific Inc., Michael Levitt, Michael Trzupek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities & Exchange Commiss
Hardie's Fruit & Vegetable Co LP et al v. Ponder Foods LLC et al
as 3:2022cv02306
Plaintiff:
Hardie's Fruit & Vegetable Co LP and Hardies Fruit and Vegetable Company-South LP
Defendant:
Ponder Foods LLC, Benjamin H. Ponder, Amy B Ponder and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Starling v. Sterling Financial & Co.
as 4:2022cv00852
Plaintiff:
R'Kes Starling
Defendant:
Sterling Financial & Co.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
