Cases 1 - 10 of 1,340
Swift v. CIR
as 24-60270
Petitioner:
Bernard T. Swift, Jr. and Kathy L. Swift
Respondent:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
IN RE AT&T SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 3:2024cv01196
Not Yet Classified:
AT&T Inc Securities Litigation
Plaintiff:
John Brazinsky, Teachers Retirement System of the City of New York, New York City Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc, Randall L Stephenson, John T Stankey and others
Petitioner:
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit, Bridget N Smagala Revocable Trust, Suresh Kodali and others
Ashley MaxwellIn re: Ashley Maxwell
as 24-50390
Petitioner:
In re: Ashley Maxwell, Zach Maxwell, Mistie Sharp and others
Respondent:
Fund Texas Choice, North Texas Equal Access Fund, Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Leonard BradtIn re: Leonard Bradt
as 24-50373
Petitioner:
In re: L. T. Bradt
Respondent:
United States of America
AT&T, Incorporated v. FCC
as 24-60223
Petitioner:
AT&T, Incorporated
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Prime Minister of Russia Vladimir Putin v. Deco 969 et al
as 4:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Prime Minister of Russia Vladimir Putin and Lakeshia Edmond
Defendant:
Deco 969, Truist Bank, Haltom Jewelry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Consensys Software Inc. v. Gensler et al
as 4:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Consensys Software Inc.
Defendant:
Gary Gensler, Caroline A. Crenshaw, Jaime E. Lizarraga and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Century Exploration Ltd Partnership et al v. U S Dept of Interior et al
as 6:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Century Exploration Ltd Partnership, Century Exploration New Orleans L L C, Century Exploration Co and others
Defendant:
U S Dept of Interior, Interior Board of Land Appeals, Debra Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
