Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01304
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Dixon
as 4:2024cv01689
Plaintiff: G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant: Vance D. Dixon doing business as AMR doing business as AMR Weekly Market
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
USA v. Vance
as 24-10343
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Antonio Vance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00706
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01503
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00027
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Johnson v. Stephens
as 21-20584
Plaintiff / Appellant: Larry B. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee: William Stephens, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Vance Drum, Director of Chaplain, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jerry Bedison, Chaplain, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
White v. Lumpkin
as 21-20381
Petitioner / Appellant: Vance L. White
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Daigle et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00726
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff: Vance Daigle and Charlene Daigle
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
James v. Vance and Huffman, LLC
as 4:2020cv02655
Plaintiff: RENADO WYNCELER JAMES
Defendant: VANCE AND HUFFMAN, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?