Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Wisener v. Revlon Consumer Products Corp
as 4:2022cv00243
Defendant:
Arkema Inc (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to Wallance & Tiernan d/b/a WTS Pharmacraft) for its Desenex line of products formerly known as Pennwalt Corporation formerly known as ELF Atochem North America Inc, Bayer Consumer Care Holdings LLC, Brenntag Specialties LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Naomi Wisener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Wisener v. Revlon Consumer Products Corp
as 3:2021cv02683
Defendant:
Arkema Inc (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to Wallance & Tiernan d/b/a WTS Pharmacraft) for its Desenex line of products formerly known as Pennwalt Corporation formerly known as Elf Atochem North America Inc, Bayer Consumer Care Holdings LLC, Revlon Consumer Products Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Naomi Wisener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. AltaMonte Care of Houston Southeast LLC et al
as 4:2021cv01373
Defendant:
ALTAMONTE MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORY GROUP, LLC, ALTAMONTE CARE OF HOUSTON SOUTHEAST LLC D/B/A ARDEN PLACE, ALTAMONTE CARE OF TEXAS LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MONROVIA CARTER and ESTATE OF REED CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Donald et al v. Market Express, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00395
Plaintiff:
Phillip Donald and Arden Wong
Defendant:
Market Express, LLC and Wayne Alan Sorensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC et al v. Shelton Investigations, LLC et al
as 4:2009cv00580
Plaintiff:
Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC and Christopher Ganter
Defendant:
Shelton Investigations, LLC and Elizabeth Arden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Barker et al v. C.R. Bard, et al
as 4:2007cv04557
Plaintiff:
Daniel F Barker, Lucille F Bragg, Pamela Cameron and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
