Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Guzman, Jr. v. Velasquez, Jr. et al
as 3:2021cv01054
Defendant:
Y J Transportation, Jose Velasquez, Jr., J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Genaro Guzman, Jr. and Genaro Guzman, Jr
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hernandez et al v. Bumbo (Pty) Ltd et al
as 3:2012cv01213
Plaintiff:
Candido Hernandez, Sr and Waikiki Hernandez
Defendant:
Bumbo (Pty) Ltd, Bumbo International Trust, Toys "R" Us Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Black et al v. Toys R US, Inc et al
as 4:2008cv03315
Plaintiff:
Amber Dawn Black, Amber Dawn Black, Brandon Black and others
Defendant:
Toys R US, Inc and Bumbo Ltd
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Cevallos et al v. Interlake Material Handling Inc
as 3:2008cv00201
Plaintiff:
Chris Cevallos, Nicholas Cevallos and Andrea Garza
Consol Plaintiff:
Matilda Silva
Defendant:
Toys"R" Us Inc, Toys"R" Us Inc, Interlake Material Handling Inc and others
Consol Defendant:
Toys"R" Us Inc, Interlake Material Handling Inc, Interroll Canada Ltd and others
Mediator:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Silva et al v. Toys "R" Us Inc et al
as 4:2007cv00305
Plaintiff:
Matilda Silva and Antonia Marin
Defendant:
Toys "R" Us Inc, Interlake Material Handling Inc, Interroll Canada Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Cevallos et al v. Toys "R" Us Inc et al
as 4:2007cv00242
Plaintiff:
Chris Cevallos, Nicholas Cevallos and Andrea Garza
Defendant:
Toys "R" Us Inc, Interlake Material Handling Inc, Interroll Canada Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wade v. Hasbro, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00225
Plaintiff:
Stacey Wade
Defendant:
Hasbro, Inc., Hasbro, Inc., Toys-R-Us, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
