Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diaz v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jesus Manuel Diaz
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, The Geo Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Littlejohn v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00084
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc. and Reeves County Detention Center I & II
Plaintiff:
Nora O. Littlejohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Minor v. The GEO Group, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00903
Plaintiff:
Patrick Minor
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garay et al v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00737
Defendant:
Russell Amaru, Gary Ray Austin, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Alvara Garay and Indalecio Garay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00486
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Garay et al v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
Indalecio Garay and Alvara Garay
Respondent:
GEO Group, Inc. and Correct Care Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garay et al v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 7:2016cv00058
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC and GEO Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alvara Garay and Indalecio Garay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell-Scott v The Geo Group, Inc
as 4:2015cv03065
Plaintiff:
Lisa Mitchell-Scott
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
