Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Monbelly v. Louisiana Workforce Commission
as 2:2023cv00885
Plaintiff:
Gary Monbelly
Defendant:
Louisiana Workforce Commission and Ava Cates
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Clervrain et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Alex Felix, Jhims Francois and others
Defendant:
Tae D. Johnson, Patrick J. Lechleitner, Ava Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilbert v. Cates et al
as 2:2020cv03428
Defendant:
Mr. Thomas J. Cortazzo, Debra Dave, Darryl M Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilbert et al v. Cortazzo et al
as 2:2020xc03430
Defendant:
Mr. Thomas J. Cortazzo, Debra Dave, Darryl M Gilbert and others
Not Classified By Court:
Dwight A. Gilbert
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilbert v. Cates et al
as 2:2019cv13654
Defendant:
Thomas J. Cortazzo, Sidney H Cates, IV, Debra Dave and others
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilbert v. Cates et al
as 2:2019cv09537
Defendant:
Thomas J. Cortazzo, Sidney H Cates, IV, Debra Dave and others
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv17121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Cates et al
as 2:2017cv12195
Defendant:
Sidney H Cates, IV , Debra Dave, Dwight A. Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Cates et al
as 2:2017cv04786
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Gilbert
Defendant:
Sidney H Cates, IV, Baldwin, Haspel, Burke & Mayer, LLC, Thomas J. Cortazzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooks v. Cates et al
as 2:2014cv01446
Plaintiff:
Arthur D. Hooks
Defendant:
Sidney H. Cates , Jason Giles and Rachel A. Meese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
