Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Roberson v. Connick et al
as 2:2023cv04022
Plaintiff:
Tamisha Bickham Roberson
Defendant:
Paul Connick, Samantha Webb, Michael Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hassen v. Bowman et al
as 3:2023cv01027
Not Classified By Court:
City of Ruston Police Department
Plaintiff:
LaBrittany Hassen
Defendant:
Chris Bowman, Hannah Bowman, A Plus Medical, LLC d/b/a Michael Brooks Family Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hassen v. Bowman et al
as 3:2023cv01026
Plaintiff:
LaBrittany Hassen
Defendant:
Chris Bowman, Hannah Bowman, A Plus Medical, LLC d/b/a Michael Brooks Family Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Nancy v. Jones et al
as 3:2017cv00687
Defendant:
Rickey A Jones, Sarah Lee and Hazel Jefferson
Plaintiff:
Nancy Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
People's Workshop,Inc. et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency, et al
as 3:2017cv00107
Defendant:
Lori Ann Bell, Department of Homeland Security, East Feliciana Police Jury and others
Plaintiff:
Beulah Bennett, Walter E. Chapman, Robert Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Ford v. Kennon et al
as 5:2014cv00789
Defendant:
Steven Kennon, Town of Sibley, Jimmy Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Hazel Mae Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00908
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
