Cases 1 - 10 of 18
McCall v. Unknown Defendants
as 3:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Frank L McCall, Jr
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green et al v. City of Monroe et al
as 3:2022cv00884
Plaintiff:
David Green, LaDaizya Tillman, Dakedra Jones and others
Defendant:
City of Monroe, Friday Ellis, City Council of Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Imani et al v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2017cv00439
Defendant:
Melvin Lee Holden, City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Plaintiff:
Blair Imani, Akeem Muhammad, Raae Pollard and others
Interested Party:
James W Craig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCall et al v. Ferguson
as 3:2017cv00308
Defendant:
Cedric Ferguson
Plaintiff:
Eric McCall and Tyrone Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. Bernice et al
as 1:2017cv00095
Plaintiff:
Frank L McCall, Jr
Defendant:
Town of Bernice and Lennie Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. Justice et al
as 1:2016cv01782
Plaintiff:
Frank L McCall, Jr
Defendant:
LA Dept of Justice and U S Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. Justice et al
as 5:2016cv01782
Plaintiff:
Frank L McCall, Jr
Defendant:
LA Dept of Justice and U S Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. James et al
as 2:2016cv16540
Plaintiff:
Barbara J. Gordon
Defendant:
Joel James, Mary Thibedeaux, Jennifer Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
McCall v. Rural Development et al
as 1:2015cv02336
Plaintiff:
Frank L McCall, Jr
Defendant:
Rural Development and Huff Management Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. Stone et al
as 1:2015cv00636
Plaintiff:
Frank L McCall, Jr
Defendant:
David E Stone, Bobby L Culpepper, Pamela P Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
