Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Witten v. Mississippi Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Carey Jason Witten
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Public Safety, Adams County Sheriff, Adams County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ahmed et al v. City of Natchez, MS et al
as 5:2021cv00058
Defendant:
Shane Daugherty, Joseph Daughtery, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Hussain, Nasser Alhumasi and Abdulla Ahmed individually and doing business as EZ Quick Stop LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. DeJoy et al
as 3:2021cv00393
Defendant:
Pam Flaggs, West Pit, Megan J. Brennan and others
Plaintiff:
Travis J. Flowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00294
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spencer v. City of Madison, Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00702
Defendant:
Officer Randy Tyler, Investigator Charles Harrison, III, SRT Commander Captain Murray and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Travis v. Harper et al
as 3:2019cv00744
Defendant:
Mayor Ryshonda Harper Beecham and The Town of Pelahatchie
Plaintiff:
Taisha Adams Travis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Guido et al
as 5:2019cv00064
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Stephen Guido, Adams County Sheriff Travis Patten and others
Plaintiff:
Triand McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
