Cases 91 - 100 of 195
Banks v. Turner et al
as 1:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Travis Banks
Defendant:
Marshal Turner, Jane Doe and Other Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Bates
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Centurion of Mississippi, Inc., Marshall Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Dion Morris
Defendant:
Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Hinds County Sheriff's Department, All Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. City of Natchez Police Department, et al
as 5:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Casey Shelton Woods
Defendant:
City of Natchez Police Department, Mack James, Danny White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gales v. The City of Hattiesburg Counsel Members et al
as 2:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Gene Gales, Jr.
Defendant:
The City of Hattiesburg Counsel Members, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Turner et al
as 1:2016cv00188
Plaintiff:
Travis Banks
Defendant:
Marshal Turner, Jane Doe and Other Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Hopson et al
as 3:2016cv00772
Plaintiff:
John Ashley Hale
Defendant:
N.P. Hopson, John or Jane Doe for Boswell, Nurse Nichels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davenport et al
as 3:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Torey Cortez Smith
Defendant:
Cully Davenport, Dexter Gates, Chip Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yost v Hodge, et al
as 2:2016cv00056
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lavon Yost
Defendant:
Alex Hodge, Randy Johnson, David Hare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
