Cases 101 - 110 of 722
Javis v. Hall
as 22-60098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thaddeus L. Javis
Defendant / Appellee:
Pelicia Hall, in official capacity and successor Mississippi Department of Corrections Commissioner, Tommy Taylor, in his official capacity Interim Commissioner, Unknown Turner, in his official capacity M.S.P. Superintendent and others
Boudreaux v. Baxter
as 22-40066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clarence Joseph Boudreaux
Defendant / Appellee:
Lonnie R. Baxter, Tony R. Mason, Captain, Edward B. Sells, Assistant Warden and others
Fults v. McNamara
as 22-50055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Fults
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Parnell McNamara, James Neyland, Corporal B. Moore and others
Manzo v. Mateware
as 22-10091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marc A. Manzo
Defendant / Appellee:
G. Mateware, Dr, FCI Seagoville, TX, K Bandas, FNP-C, FCI Seagoville, TX, Shao Le, Dr, FCI Seagoville, TX and others
Denby v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2021cv01300
Plaintiff:
Donis Lemond Denby
Defendant:
Bryan Collier - TDCJ Director, FNU Garcia, FNU Delapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denby v. Garcia et al
as 6:2021cv01315
Plaintiff:
Donis Lemond Denby
Defendant:
FNU Garcia, FNU Delapp, FNU Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Schilhab et al
as 2:2021cv00285
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson
Defendant:
Sian Schilhab, Vicente Santini, Unknown Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Watson et al
as 6:2021cv01216
Plaintiff:
Reginald Harris
Defendant:
FNU Watson, Vernon Busby and Correctional Officer FNU Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luevano v. Alsobrook et al
as 6:2021cv01212
Plaintiff:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant:
Warden FNU Alsobrook, Correctional Officer FNU Doe, Jennifer Coalston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Comal County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2021cv01124
Plaintiff:
Eric Nicholas Gonzales
Defendant:
Comal County Sheriff's Office and Correctional Officer Joshua Swillinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
