Cases 101 - 110 of 212
Cobos v. Potter et al
as 1:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Cobos
Defendant:
Gary Potter, John W Smith, Robert Junell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyre v. UTMB et al
as 9:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Stevie Wyre
Defendant:
UTMB, Owen J Murray, Theodore Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chaisson v. Eastham Unit Ad Seg Security et al
as 9:2016cv00201
Plaintiff:
Queronde Chaisson
Defendant:
Eastham Unit Ad Seg Security, Eastham Unit Food Service Management, Eastham Unit Ad Seg Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Hernandez et al
as 2:2016cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Arneal Butler
Defendant:
Jose H Hernandez, Garrett D Dressler, Christopher A Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Davis
as 4:2016cv02914
Petitioner:
Charles Steven Lane
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCray v. Livingston et al
as 6:2016cv01157
Plaintiff:
Robert Harley McCray
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Bryan Collier, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copeland v. Texas Dept of Human Resources
as 6:2016cv01048
Plaintiff:
Curtis G Copeland
Defendant:
Texas Dept of Human Resources, Phyllis Kidwell, Dan Depue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. United States Of America
as 7:2016cv00278
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Lane
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Adams v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00671
Plaintiff:
Spence Lane Adams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lane v. Stephens
as 3:2016cv00113
Petitioner:
Joshua Lane
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
