Cases 101 - 108 of 108
Bush v. Van Buren, et al
as 08-10187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARBARA M BUSH
Defendant - Appellee:
GINNY VAN BUREN, Warden, EDULFO GONZALEZ, Dr, TRENT H EVANS, Dr and others
Carbe v. US Dept of Justice, et al
as 08-20020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILTON EARL CARBE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Southern District of Texas and G COOK, Assistant United States Attorney, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. In Their Individual and Official Capacities.
Bush v. Van Buren et al
as 4:2007cv00743
Plaintiff:
Barbara M Bush
Defendant:
Ginny Van Buren, Edulfo Gonzalez, Trent H Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carbe v. United States Department Of Justice et al
as 4:2007cv03180
Plaintiff:
Milton Earl Carbe
Defendant:
United States Department Of Justice, United States Attorney and G Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2007cv01220
Petitioner:
Bruce A McDonald
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice, Seagoville FCI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Washington v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2007cv01224
Petitioner:
Lonnie U. Washington
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice and NFN Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Felder v. Miles, et al
as 07-40063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE RICHARD FELDER
Defendant - Appellee:
R D MILES, Warden, United States Penitentiary Beaumont, SOLICITOR GENERAL, United States Department of Justice, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Anderson v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 05-30965
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMIE ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, ROBERT M TAPIA, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
