Cases 101 - 110 of 102,692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00256
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McCoy v. Saunders
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
James McCoy
Defendant:
M.D. Frank Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frankenfield v. Goodall et al
as 9:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
FNU Smith, FNU Goodall, TDCJ Parole Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. David George Hillburn et al
as 4:2024cv01834
Plaintiff:
Aaron Bernard Poole
Defendant:
David George Hillburn, Kevin W. Capps and Tiffany Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Limestone County, Texas
as 6:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Tometheus Bryant
Defendant:
Limestone County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mousavi v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2024cv01775
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ali Mousavi
Defendant:
Director Alejandro N. Mayorkas, US ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND, Mr. Randy Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Billingslea v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01140
Petitioner:
Darrell Bernard Billingslea
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01754
Petitioner:
Robert Cor'Darius Taylor
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
